Body Fat Measurement by Hand to Hand Impedance Underestimates Fat Mass

I have been preaching that for years: "Do not trust in body fat monitors". Those things will give you one of their random numbers for a six-pack of beer. Now, a study by Esco et.al. (Esco. 2010) scientifically validated my scepticism (which in part is rooted in the knowledge I acquired in the course of my university studies in physics):
[...] When compared with the DEXA [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry], the mean values for BIA [Body Impedance analysis] were significantly lower for BF% (DEXA = 27.6 +/- 5.3%, BIA = 22.5 +/- 3.5%, p < 0.01) and higher for FFM (DEXA = 47.2 +/- 4.5 kg, BIA = 50.6 +/- 4.6 kg, p < 0.01). The results of this investigation indicate that hand-to-hand BIA significantly underestimates BF% and overestimated FFM in college-age female athletes when compared with the criterion DEXA. Practitioners should use caution when analyzing body composition with hand-held BIA in a population of athletic women.
Although the scientists restrict their conclusion to the particular population under study, the same will hold true for men and the non-athletic population as well. The charge will always take the path of least resistance. It is thus unrealistic to expect to get realistic full-body stats from measuring a current that runs from hand to hand or toe to toe (as it is the case of the above mentioned body fat scales).
As I do not expect you to have a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer standing in your bathroom, you might as well use a cheap measuring tape to track your progress. While it will not give you a percent value it is a more reliable tool to evaluate one's dieting progress (i.e. muscle vs. fat loss) than any scale will ever be.
Disclaimer:The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is by no means intended as professional medical advice. Do not use any of the agents or freely available dietary supplements mentioned on this website without further consultation with your medical practitioner.