Saturday, January 7, 2012

Training, Detraining, Retraining: Build Bigger and Stronger Muscles by Taking 3 Weeks Off!?

Image 1: This dog obviously knows how beneficial it is to take 3 weeks off and detrain. If we go by his physique, he did probably not realize that without (pre-)training and retraining the distinct line between detraining and laziness becomes as blurred - as blurred, by the way, as many it is for training junkies like me ;-)
I plead guilty! Guilty of not taking enough time off - against better judgment. In that, it is not the idea that I would "lose muscle" that urges me to the gym, it is not that I would be afraid to get fat and I could probably even stifle my desire to lift heavy objects, if it was not for the little man in my ear who keeps telling me: "Well, you won't get fat and you won't lose muscle, but think about it: You are fit, young and strong! Why waste your time idling around? Go for it hit the weights and let the veins pop" ... and alas, his words are too convincing to put my gymbag back into the locker and write one of the 237 blogposts I am constantly thinking about and never finding the time to compile. Thanks to Steven Arcera, who, by the way, is somewhat of the productive, digital counterpart of the little man in my ear, as he is constantly pricking new ideas into my brain by posting questions, links to studies and hypothesis on my Facebook wall, I do now have a scientifically validated counterargument that could (theoretically ;-) shut the small nag up... for 3 full weeks!

6 Weeks on, 3 weeks off, 6 weeks on OR 15 weeks on - what is more "productive"?

Aside from the longer, more in-depth articles here at the SuppVersity, the studies, we are dealing with on a daily basis are usually not older than max. 4 weeks. In view of the fact that even "Prof. Dr.", i.e. me, is only human, it sometimes happens that I a) either miss the publication of an interesting paper or b) file it under "candidates" and then forget about it... the latter happened with a study, Steven referenced in a brief discussion we had on facebook about "priming muscles for new growth". Since the results do however fit in pretty nicely with the concept of "skeletal muscle hypertrophy" I have been trying to establish in the course of the latest installments of the Intermittent Thoughts (yes, there will be a follow up on testosterone tomorrow ;-), I decided that it was about time to finally acknowledge the results of a May 2011 paper by Riki Ogasawara et al. (Ogasawara. 2011).

In their 15-week randomized trial, Ogasawara and his colleagues put 15 young (24.7y), previously untrained male subjects onto identical training regimen. In three supervised training sessions per week the subjects performed 3 sets of 10 reps at 70% of their predetermined 1-RM max. The latter was re-assessed every three weeks and the weight was adjusted appropriately. After 6 weeks of training 8 randomly selected subjects "had" to take 3 weeks off (retraining group), while the rest of the subjects kept their regular 3x per week training schedule (continuous group). At the beginning of week 9, the now "detrained" subjects resumed their training regimen, until after week 15, a final testing session was scheduled to provide the data we need to answer a question, of which I know that it already preys on your minds:  "Did the three weeks away from the gym compromise the progress in the retraining group?" 
Figure 1: Development of triceps brachii and pectoralis major CSA of the continuously training and the detraining/retraining group in the course of the 15-week study period (data adapted from Ogasawara. 2011)
If you take a cursory glance at the data in figure 1, the answer to this question must be "YES!" (I think I just heard the little man in my ear rejoice ;-) - there is no debating: the triceps cross-sectional area (CSA) of the continuous trainers grew 2.4% more, the pectoralis major even 5.7% more, but with the given standard deviations of >7% and >10%, the little man in my ear will be having a hard time to convince me that I would miss out on muscle gains, when I took three weeks of - and that, even if I were a bloody beginner.

If we now assume that with my reluctance to take even a complete week off, my size gains would already have reached the "quasi-plateau" that is situated to the right of the logarithmic graph which describes the CSA development of the continuous training group, one could even make an argument that I and any other advanced trainee, whose gains have been slowing down over the last couple of weeks, would see an even more profound "growth boost" after 3 weeks of detraining, than the previously untrained subjects in the Ogasawara study. In fact, the increase in the amount of muscle mass I  would be able to accrue per week, might not only compensate (within the statistical margin ;-), but rather surpass the gains I thought I constantly fear I could "miss" during my off time.
Figure 2: Development of bench press 1RM strength and triceps brachii maximum voluntary contractive force of the continuously training and the detraining/retraining group in the course of the 15-week study period (data adapted from Ogasawara. 2011)
Moreover, the fact that the strength gains, in general, and the maximum voluntary contractile force the subjects were able to apply to a Biodex dynamometer with their elbow extensors, in particular, exhibit similar or even smaller differences (cf. figure 2), provide additional arguments by the means of  which I could probably convince myself that detraining is not for retiring athletes only.
Figure 3: Development of bench press 1RM strength (left) and triceps brachii maximum voluntary contractive force to triceps brachii CSA ratio (data adapted from Ogasawara. 2011)
And if that is still not enough to lay aside the dumb- and barbells for at least 2 weeks (you see I am negotiating again ;-), I could make a point that I do not only want to look strong, but also want to be strong; and as the right graph in figure 3 shows quite clearly, the three-weeks detraining period lead to 2.3% larger, yet again statistically non-significant increase in the pound per pound force production of the triceps muscle of the study participants in the retraining group.

Detraining is neither for pussies nor for retiring athletes, only

I guess, the foregoing subheading, summarizes the main take-away message of the study quite nicely. In view of the non-existent loss in muscle mass and strength in the course of the detraining period and the subsequent "growth spurt" (relative steep linear vs. leveled logarithmic increases in weeks 9-15), it should be obvious that the incorporation of strategic detraining periods into your training schedule is more than a welcome opportunity for laziness (something that totally turns me off, btw.). It is rather a phase where the reconstruction processes you have learned about in the Hypertrophy 101 and the subsequent installments of the Intermittent Thoughts will carve the way for future gains. Whether this will suffice to soothe the little man in your ear, I don't know... maybe you can negotiate a 2-weeks detraining period for the start ;-)


  1. I have observed something similar. I tend to insert one week of detraining whenever my strength gains start to stall, which is usually once every 5-6 weeks. I have found out that although I have to start at a lower strength levels in the first week after the break, I usually get a new personal record in the second or third week.

  2. Having reached a plateau myself, any additional evidence would be most welcome.

  3. @Magumi: Your observation stands in line with what the research is saying. Give your body time to do the "deep level repair / reconstruction processes" and you will see a leap in performance

    @ProudDaddy: I will keep my eyes open and keep you guys up to date ;)

  4. It was an excellent effort made by you through your nice piece of writing, holding the quality and knowledge together for the readers.