SuppVersity - Nutrition and Exercise Science for Everyone

The "Bizzy Diet" works, the supplements that are suggested in the program at BB.com  are useless, though. You know that I am a fan of supplement companies that try to support the often hilarious claims on their product labels with science. Against that background, I feel there's nothing wrong with MusclePharm sponsoring, ah... I mean "funding" a recent study by researchers from the University of... ah, I mean, from Bodybuilding.com and the Ohio State University (Kendall 2017) - and that's not just in those (not exactly rare cases) when said research proves that their "thermogenic" powerhouse is actually a hilariously underdosed barrel burst. Learn more about alleged and true fat burner at the SuppVersity For Caffeine, Timing Matters! 45 Min or More? DMAA (Jack3D) - The Good, the Bad & the Evil How 'Harmless' are T2-Based Fat Burners, Really? DMHA a Legitimate DMAA Successor Fat Burners: Non-Stimulant, Non-Effectiv...

This would unquestionably be at the lower end of contest BF% levels (avg. 12%) the women in this study achieved, The number of studies on fitness and bodybuilding competitions is limited. Probably you will remember my previous discussions of the paper/s by Rossow, et al. ("Natural bodybuilding competition preparation and recovery: a 12-month case study." | 2013)  Kistler, et al. ("Case Study: Natural Bodybuilding Contest Preparation." International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism", 2014), and  Robinson et al. ("A nutrition and conditioning intervention for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: case study" | 2015). And yes, three is not just the number of studies that I've covered at the SuppVersity , it's also the number of decently recent studies dabbling with dieting down for a contest in one of the "physique sports". High protein helps, but do not counter the weight-loss-induced changes in RMR ...

Is she going to binge after this body weight squat workout? Nah, don't worry... I've repeatedly written about studies that show that the Taubs'ian notion that "exercise is useless because it just makes you hungry" is bullsh*t. It is indeed useless to work out to burn calories, it is yet never useless to work out - even if fat loss, not health or longevity is your goal. What you should be aware of, though, is that there is a gender bias in the selecting of subjects in health sciences; and since the average subject in nutrition and exercise sciences is male and studies that have enough male and female subjects to identify relevant sex differences are rare, we don't really know if everything that has been "scientifically proven" can also be considered "scientifically proven" for female dieters and/or trainees. Learn more about the (often ;-) small but significant difference at the SuppVersity 1g PRO per 2g CHO + Circuit T. for Wome...

Bicycling to work is one of these "small things" that may make the difference between lean and obese. I know this is not what your friends will want to hear, but for 99.9% of them it's  not  their genes which are to blame for their inability to lose weight. It's much simpler than that: It's their inability or unwillingness to induce a large enough caloric deficit to force their bodies to tap into the fat stores. Don't get me wrong: It's obvious that genes, with their direct and indirect influence on one's basal energy requirements (think of being tall vs. being small, if nothing else), amount of muscle, and even ability to handle glucose and fats, will factor in here. In the end, however, it's everyone's knowledge about the dos and don'ts of dieting, effort and dietary adherence that will make the difference. That's no news for you? I think the results of a recent study from the University of Kansas Medical Center and the Texas T...