SuppVersity - Nutrition and Exercise Science for Everyone

We all know this is not a healthy breakfast. What we don't or rather didn't know, though, is that you have to test on two consecutive days to find out how unhealthy it actually is for your kids' brains. With Young's study we learned that. In what? That's probably what you are asking yourself now that you've read that beef beats pickled, but not baked herring, right? Well the answer to this question can be found in my brief summary of the results of Svelander's recent meal-response study. It's, as you may have guessed, the insulin response that sucks for pickled herring. What sucks even more, though, are mothers who are afraid of protein. After all, Liu's latest study shows that they may be setting their kids up to a life as skinny fatness. When I come to think about it, this may yet be better than giving your kids a high glycemic load breakfast to take to school. After all, Young's latest study shows quite impressively what previous studies...

Tell me that's not you! (img. Geeks.Pirillo.com) While the risk of birth has decreased by 99% in the course of the 20th century, from approximately 850 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 1900 to 7.5 in 1982, it is - at least in the US - stagnating ever since (2002 data from the CDC; cf. Chang. 2002). This does not just mean that the Healthy People 2000 objective for maternal mortality of no more than 3.3 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births was not achieved during the twentieth century; it does also mean that your mother - irrespective of your and her age risked her life for you, the very moment you were born. And I am pretty sure that regardless of whether she's had the chance to do just that again, she'd be willing to sacrifice her life, if that would save yours. This alone would be worth cherishing what she has done and hopefully is and will be doing for you on at least one day of the year! Now, science is a pretty impersonal business and using questi...

Supplemental fish oil: Panacea or rat poison? Well, I know you all love your fish oil. And you probably know I don't ;-) And this is why I am "happy" (yes, I am biased, here) to report the unfortunate results of a Danish study ( Cheatham. 2011 ), which investigated the effects of moderate dose fish oil supplementation @ 1.5 g/d n-3 LCPUFA (vs. olive oil as placebo) during the first 4 months of lactation on the cognitive performance of 98 children. The data was obtained at the age of seven by a combination of an "age-appropriate Stroop task , and the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire ". The results were quite unequivocal: [...] analyses including all participants revealed the speed of processing scores were predicted by maternal n-3 LCPUFA intake during the intervention period ( negative relation ) and maternal education (positive relation). Stroop scores indicative of working memory and inhibitory control wer...