SuppVersity - Nutrition and Exercise Science for Everyone

Macronutrient ratios matters, but food quality does, too. And so do exercise, laziness, sleep, .... the list is endless, so can we be surprised that modulating GI and protein is not helping much? We all "know" that going low(er) carb is good for your blood glucose management, right? Nice! So, we probably don't need studies like the Marleen A. van Baak's conducted only recently, right? I mean, carbs are bad! So why would we even be interested to hear how much the subjects of the Diogenes Study lost on one of four different diets with varying protein content and glycemic index? Or who would want to know what the subjects' 24-h glucose profiles on one out of four diets differing in carbohydrate content by 10 energy % and glycemic index by 20 units during three days. No one would like to know that, right!? In view of the fact that you're still there, I suppose that I was wrong and you are interested in the effects of different marconutrient ratios and type...

Image 1: Diogenes , a critical thinker of the ancient world and eponym of a European research project; a man right after my liking, who would not tire questioning common "wisdom". I must forewarn you: Being part of the pan-European Diogenes Project , the study I am going to tell you about in the following is not something you can read or understand in a few minutes. Aimed at elucidating the intricate relationship(s) between Di et Ob esity and Genes [the acronym DIOGENES was aptly chosen, for there is little doubt that Diogenes, if he lived today, would certainly feel inclined to debunk many of the nutritional idiocies of our age, cf. image 1], the project that is financially supported by the European Union, is literally epic. Its newest spin-off, an investigation into the "blood profiles of proteins and steroids during weight maintenance with manipulation of dietary protein level and glycaemic index" ( Wang. 2011 ), is no except...