Posts

Showing posts with the label formula

Popular topics

Show more

Predictive Value of Equations to Calculate Your Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) Flawed: Results Can Be 14-29% Off

Image
Would she still look so happy, if she knew that thee treadmill just lied to her? I have written, said and, in person, even shouted it out often enough: Once you start to rely on the figures certain formulas generate (and this includes what your treadmill, your heart rate monitor etc. will produce, 'cause they use the same flawed formulas), you are lost. The message of today's SuppVersity article is therefore by no means a new one. What's pretty new, though, is the study by V. Bonghana and colleagues from University of Campinas who have compared five predictive equations that are supposed to predict your and everyone else's basal (=excluding physical activity) energy demands (Bonghana. 2013). "Start with a 15% energy deficit" - based on what? The above, i.e. to start dieting by consuming ~15% less energy than you usually do, is my usual suggestion for anyone who's not in the "so fat that your health is in danger" zone, someone like you...

Grape Seed Extract Protects EPA & DHA From Intestinal Oxidation. Niacin Shifts Muscle Fiber Type. Cholesterol & Sialic Acid Build Babies' Brains. Pro-Diabetic GUMPs 4 Kids

Image
"What? Don't gimme that look. I did walk to the fast-food outlet. I swear!" - When it comes to how much they sit around, people love to lie... ah, I mean they often overestimate their activity level - especially the really lazy ones ;-) It's not always easy to find a "figure of the week" and actually the on I am going to present you today is not "week specific". It is rather related to yesterday's post on the statistics of the diabesity epidemic . That said, you may remember that the gap between "more" and "less" active individuals was widening, but on average the NHANES stats would suggest that the average US citizen is not sitting around much longer today (or rather in 2004) than 40 years ago. Now, the NHANES data is based on a questionnaire of which Healy et al., who have analyzed the accuracy of these self-reported activity levels in a 2010 paper (Healy. 2011), found that the difference between the real and the clai...
Disclaimer:The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is by no means intended as professional medical advice. Do not use any of the agents or freely available dietary supplements mentioned on this website without further consultation with your medical practitioner.