(Super-)slow vs. Traditional Weight Lifting Affects Satellite (=Muscle Progenitor) Cells, Fiber & Domain Sizes Differently
In know one could argue that you may see different results for other body parts than legs which were the only muscle group trained in the study at hand. While the overall majority of currently available studies appears to suggest that traditional resistance training regimen with cadences of 1-2s on the concentric and eccentric parts of the exercises are superior to their (super-)slow counterparts, the debate is far from being settled. Accordingly, the results of a recent study from the Ohio University are highly interesting. The findings Jennifer R. Herman-Montemayor, Robert S. Hikida and Robert S. Staron present in their latest paper could after all explain why "classic" resistance training resistance outperformed their (super-)slow cousins in the majority of studies. Learn more about powerful muscle builders at the SuppVersity Tri- or Multi-Set Training for Body Recomp.? Alternating Squat & Blood Pressure - Productive? Pre-Exhaustion Exhausts Your Grow...