Posts

Showing posts with the label exercise-induced energy expenditure

Popular topics

Show more

Fewer Than 1 in 100 People Need More Than 2.4 Times Their Resting Energy Expenditure | Eating More 'll Make You Fat!

Written by | published on
Image
Sweet potatoes alone won't cut it for Tour de France Cyclists and people on a North Pole Expedition - the only study subjects who need >5x their RMR. I assume you won't have the technical equipment to measure your total energy expenditure by the means of doubly labeled water. Accordingly, I would suggest you go back to my recent article about the accuracy of equations to calculate your resting energy expenditure (read it). Once you know that you multiply it by 2.0-2.4 and that's it: You are not going to expend more energy per day, bro... How do I know? From a recent paper by Klaas R. Westerterp published in the Proceedings of the Nutrition Society  (2017). In the paper, he reviewed results from doubly labeled water studies of the total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) under daily living conditions. What will affect your energy expenditure  and how much energy do you expend? Intermittent Fasting Boosts Energy Exp. (EE) 3 Revelations About EE While Lifting ...
Read full article »

Energy Requirements of Resistance Training: Training Legs Burns 2x More Energy Than Biceps, Squatting 35kcal+/min

Written by | published on
Image
Squats feel like and are energy hungry. I don't know if you own a fitness tracker. If you do, however, you will know that the number it's going to give you when you've been working out (as in lifting weight) is random and usually completely off what you'd estimate you burned in the gym... speaking of which: What's your estimate? How much are you going to burn on that biceps curls and during those squats? Today's SuppVersity  article is going to help you estimate how much energy your workouts really require by providing you with a concise, commented summary of the latest study from the University of TrĂ¡s-os-Montes & Alto Douro  in Vila Real, Portugal (Reis 2017). A summary that will also address how accurate and reliable the results of the study are. What will affect your energy expenditure  and how much energy do you expend? Intermittent Fasting Boosts Energy Exp. (EE) 3 Revelations About EE While Lifting How Dieting Reduces Your EE via the...
Read full article »

Three Surprising Revelations About the Energetic Costs of Weight Training | Effects of Intensity, Rest, Speed & More

Written by | published on
Image
The patterns that emerge in Figure 1-3  already suggest that Crossfit gyms are the places where the average user will "leave the most calories" on the floor. Even regular circuit training programs burn ~10kcal/min (Gettman 1981). Graduate research from 2013 suggests that exhausting Crossfit workouts can burn as much as 20kcal/min (Babiash 2013). From previous SuppVerity  articles, you will remember that the number of calories the classic cardio equipment will tell you you'd burned during your last session often is completely off. You have also learned about a year ago that even the best fitness trackers have a margin of error of ~10% - and that's for walking, jogging or running, where it's really easy to estimate the energy requirements. And, assuming that you've been around for quite some time, you may remember that there's credible evidence that we systematically underestimate the energy expenditure of push-ups, pull-ups, burpees and other bodyweig...
Read full article »

Role of Muscle and CNS in Diet-Induced Decline of Exercise-Induced Energy Expenditure | Caffeine & Nicotine May Help!

Written by | published on
Image
While "calories count" when it comes to losing body fat, the notion that you would always burn the same amount of energy with a given workout - irrespective of your energy intake - is completely bogus and only one of the reasons why meticulous calorie counting won't work.  Let's address it right away: Yes, the paper Tariq I. Almundarij et al. published in the peer-reviewed journal "Physiological Reports" (Almundarij 2017) deals with a rodent experiment, but  with the goal of the study being to identify the fundamental mechanisms behind, not the extent of metabolic adaptation to calorically reduced energy intakes, this does not disqualify its results as irrelevant for humans - on the contrary (and trust me, I'd prefer a human or at least a pig study, too). With that being said, let's take a look at what the scientists did to "investigate the role of MC4R in the modulation of muscle work efficiency, and test the hypothesis that energy restri...
Read full article »
Disclaimer:The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is by no means intended as professional medical advice. Do not use any of the agents or freely available dietary supplements mentioned on this website without further consultation with your medical practitioner.