Garlic & Red Yeast Rice: Manage Your Blood Lipids W/Out Statins - 12+1 Natural Alternatives Reviewed (Part I)

Red yeast rice is the "+1" in this SuppVersity Mini-Series because it is actually a "statin". Similar effects, similar side effects and all that (probably) because of the similar structure of its lipid lowering active ingredient(s).

"Twelve + 1"? I know that sounds odd, but I have my reason to single one of the natural alternatives, two scientists from the Chulalongkorn University in Thailand list in their 2016 review "A Review of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Implications of Naturally Derived Dietary Supplements for Dyslipidemia", right from the start: red yeast rice (RYR).

While garlic, which will also be discussed in today's first installment of what is going to become a mini-series, also has the ability to decrease your HMG-CoA reductase activity, only RYR does that at a similar potency as statins do; which is why its use entails the risk of similar side effects as they have been reported for regular statin drugs Whether RYR is thus your best "natural alternative" is highly questionable.

All about cholesterol & related stories in previous SuppVersity articles:

Cholesterol Boosts Immunity

Eggs Promote Heart Health

All About Eggs (Focus on Yolk)

Silicon-Powered Anti-CVD Foods

Paleo Works W/ High Cholesterol

Coconut Oil to Control Chol.

On the other hand, the fact that the monacolins, the main bioactive compounds in RYR, is not debatable. Only recently, a meta-analysis by Li et al. (2014) reported no serious side effects and concluded based on 13 RCTs that "red yeast rice is an effective and relatively safe approach for dyslipidemia" (Li. 2014). Li et al. do yet also know that "further long-term, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are still warranted before red yeast rice could be recommended to patients with dyslipidemia, especially as an alternative to statins" (Li. 2014).

Figure 1: Effects of 1,200mg/d red yeast rice (RYR) on blood lipids in statin-intolerant subjects (left | Venro. 2010) and subject-dependent reductions in LDL in the latest meta-analysis of the effects of RYR (right | Li. 2014).

If you are statin intolerant, however, Venro et al's study in 25 statin-intolerant subjects who received 1,200 mg RYR at bedtime, however, would suggest that you in particular could benefit from RYR as it appears to have a rather good tolerability in those subjects who cannot take regular statins.

Don't be a fool! This article is no statin or anti-cholesterol add. Nobody says that taking statins without a good reason would be wise. In fact, even the relatively well-tolerated RYR which works by the same mechanism, produced (albeit tolerable) muscle weakness and muscle pain as adverse effects in most clinical studies; a downside that points to the 'demusculizing' effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors - even if the difference to placebo reached statistical significance only in few (albeit short-term) studies (Liu. 2006 & Li. 2014).

Further evidence that, as so often, individuality is key comes from the differential effects in European, Asian and US subjects (see Figure 1 showing data from Li. 2014). The latter, however, may be explained by both, the genetic configuration of the subjects, and the high ingredient variability of commercially available RYR preparations of which a comparative analysis of 10 commercial red yeast rice products reports a >30-fold range in total monacolin content. The authors of said study also highlight:

"Furthermore, compared with the full spectrum of monacolins expected in a red yeast rice dietary supplement, with monacolin K representing 55% to 60%, 4 of the 10 products were >90% monacolin K, suggesting that they were actually food-grade red yeast rice “spiked” with lovastatin, the prescription statin that is chemically identical to monacolin K" (Mark. 2010).

And Mark et al. are not the only ones reporting an intolerable degree of cutting in the snake oil industry. Similar results have been presented by Gordon et al. who tested 12 products that are regularly sold and consumed in the US and found total monacolin contents ranging from 0.31 to 11.15 mg/capsule. Just like Mark et al. Gordon et al. also found monacolin K (lovastatin | 0.10-10.09 mg/capsule), which could occur naturally, albeit not at very high doses, in many and the kidney-damaging citrinin in four of the twelve tested products (33%).

Garlic is a HMG-CoA inhibitor that doesn't have the problems of statins & RYR ...

...or, we simply don't know about them yet, because the currently available garlic supplements all suffer from the pathetic bioavailability of allicin (which is broken down enzymatically before it reaches your bloodstream | Lawson. 2001), which could - in very high doses that have not been tested in studies yet - possibly have similar negative side effects as the monocalins in RYR.

More recently, however, studies have suggested that allicin may not even be necessary for some of the beneficial effects of garlic. In particular, its general anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects appear to be mediated mainly by S-allyl cysteine. Furthermore, "various chemical constituents in garlic products, including nonsulfur compounds such as saponins, may contribute to the essential biological activities of garlic" (Amagase. 2006) - including their anti-lipidemic effect.

I want to try it - What's the optimal dosing for garlic and RYR? While the evidence for the more powerful RYR is relatively conclusive and says that effective dosage(s) range from 600 and 3600 mg (depending on product quality and how significant your 'cholesterol-problem' is), reliable dosage suggestions are hard to make for garlic. In the previously cited recent review from Thailand (Thaipitakwong & Aramwit. 2016), the suggestion is 2–5 g of fresh garlic, 0.4–1.2 g of dried powder, 2–5 mg of oil and 300–1000 mg - "any other preparations should correspond to 4–12 mg of alliin or 2–5 mg of allicin" (ibid.). As previously pointed out, however, there's probably one study to refute the efficacy of real-food or supplemental garlic at the given dosages for every two studies that support it. Eventually, you will thus have to self-experiment to find out if and at which dosages garlic can exert a significant effect on your blood lipids.

In contrast to their active ingredient, however, the efficacy of garlic and garlic supplements as anti-hyperlipidemic drugs is well-established. One of the most cited meta-analyses (39 RCTs with 2298 participants | Ried. 2013) found that, overall, garlic consumption caused significant changes in serum levels of total cholesterol (–15.25 mg/dl; p < 0.0001), LDL-C (–6.41 mg/dl; p = 0.02), and HDL-C (1.49 mg/dl; p = 0.02), whereas the triglyceride levels appeared to be unaffected (I will address this in a follow-up, but if you eat your garlic with fatty fish, this should address the triglyceride issue). In addition, a more recent meta-analysis revealed that it will also reduce the level of lipoprotein (a) in the blood of hyperlipidemic subjects (Sahebkar. 2016).

Figure 2: Effects of garlic supplements on LDL (left, red) and HDL (right, green) according to a 2013 meta-analysis of  39 RCTs with 2298 participants (Ried. 2013) - the results have generally been confirmed more recently (Ried. 2016). 

Needless to say that, for garlic, just like RYR and any other drug or supplement, conflicting evidence exists. Early studies, for example, didn't report consistent effects on LDL and HDL. Whether that's due to different types (raw, powder, oil, and aged extract), processing and doses of garlic products used, or the subjects' baseline lipid levels and the study duration is something neither Thaipitakwong & Aramwit (2016), in their review, nor I can tell you due to the lack of studies that directly investigate the individual effects of these parameters. studies. The latter is also true for the bioavailability of raw garlic vs. supplements and the various types of 'garlic products' on the market. As the previously cited study from Thailand rightly concludes: the individual bioavailability simply has not been studied, yet (Thaipitakwong & Aramwit. 2016).

It should never be your goal to eradicate cholesterol. What you want is to control your levels within a rationale range that is probably much higher (esp. for total cholesterol) than the US recommendations to reap the benefits this essential hormone precursor and building block of your cells will have on endocrine, immune, muscle and brain function.

To be continued: If you miss the promised 11 'true' alternatives that won't mess with your HMG-CoA enzyme activity, I can reassure you, there will be a follow-up in which you can learn more about phytosterols, sesame, green tea, probiotics, fiber, chitosan, soy, flaxseed, guggul, krill and fish oil.

Until then, I would like to leave you with the conclusion that garlic is both, the less effective, and less side-effect prone natural alternative to statins. In contrast to red yeast rice, which is practically a "natural statin", it is yet able to control only "slightly elevated" (Ried. 2016) cholesterol levels; and not those you will see irrespective of your diet due to an inheritable genetic disposition and/or known or unknown pathologies (oftentimes one or several of the other components of the metabolic syndrome) | Comment!

References:

• Amagase, Harunobu. "Clarifying the real bioactive constituents of garlic." The Journal of nutrition 136.3 (2006): 716S-725S.
• Gordon, et al. "Marked variability of monacolin levels in commercial red yeast rice products." Arch Intern Med 170.19 (2010): 1722-1727.
• Lawson, Larry D., and Z. Jonathan Wang. "Low allicin release from garlic supplements: a major problem due to the sensitivities of alliinase activity." Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 49.5 (2001): 2592-2599.
• Li, Yinhua, et al. "A meta-analysis of red yeast rice: an effective and relatively safe alternative approach for dyslipidemia." PloS one 9.6 (2014): e98611.
• Liu, Jianping, et al. "Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." Chinese medicine 1.1 (2006): 1.
• Mark, David A. "All red yeast rice products are not created equal—or legal." The American journal of cardiology 106.3 (2010): 448.
• Venero, Carmelo V., et al. "Lipid-lowering efficacy of red yeast rice in a population intolerant to statins." The American journal of cardiology 105.5 (2010): 664-666.
• Sahebkar, Amirhossein, et al. "Effect of garlic on plasma lipoprotein (a) concentrations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials." Nutrition 32.1 (2016): 33-40.
• Ried, Karin, Catherine Toben, and Peter Fakler. "Effect of garlic on serum lipids: an updated meta-analysis." Nutrition reviews 71.5 (2013): 282-299.
• Ried, Karin. "Garlic lowers blood pressure in hypertensive individuals, regulates serum cholesterol, and stimulates immunity: an updated meta-analysis and review." The Journal of nutrition 146.2 (2016): 389S-396S.

Supplemental (!) Coconut Diet Reduces Waist Circumference in Men more Than in Women While Leaving Lipid Profiles Unchanged

I take the recent New York Times Article on coconut oil as clear evidence of the fact that the health benefit of tropical oils is getting more and more public attention. Studies that establish the many anecdotal reports you can find all over the Internet may even speed up this process and thus I am happy to report the findings of a Malasian study (Liau. 2011) that clearly underlines that the "bad" saturated fat cannot be so "bad" after all.

The scientists had a group of 20 healthy, but obese Malay volunteers consume an additional 30 mL of coconut oil (approx 2 tablespoons) per day taken in three divided doses, half an hour before each meal (as far as digestive side effects are concerned, this was the best tolerated dose as assessed before the actual study) and found...

that only waist circumference [WC] was significantly reduced after one month of VCO with a mean reduction of 2.87 +/-4.95 cm.

The high standard deviation of this data may well be attributed to the fact that there was no additional control of the dietary habits of the volunteers. The study says subjects "continued their weight loss efforts", but you probably know these "efforts" often turn out to be hardly comparable. I also feel that the real-world significance of the scientists statistical assessment "WC reduction was only seen in males" must be reevaluated, especially in view of the fact that "the reduction [meaning in cm WC] was larger in females" and the reduction in females with BMI <30 (4.8 +/-6.1 cm), other than in females with BMI >30 2.61 +/-2.17) was statistically significant (for more data cf. figure 1).

Figure 1: Comparison of mean differences in anthropometric measurements and lipid profile values in 7 males and 13 females after VCO consumption. (Liau. 2011)

I refrain from commenting on the reasons and invite readers to come up with their own theories, why someone who has gotten to a BMI of >30 (!!) may have problems losing weight on an uncontrolled intervention. What this should tell you, however, is that you may safely assume that 2 x tablespoons of coconut oil (~30ml) à day may be a worthwhile addition to your well-planned diet & exercise regimen.

On a side note: Who knows how much centimeters the volunteers had lost if the had just replaced some of the "good" seed oils in their diets? Well, I guess in view of the fact that the scientists seemed surprised that the bad saturated fats in coconut oil did not ruin their volunteers fatty acid profiles, they probably considered it unethical to ask their participants to completely replace corn with coconut oil ;-)

Overweight Boys More at Risk of Obesity Related Health Problems than Girls

In a recent study from Egypt, Hassan et.al. took anthropometric measures of adiposity from 150 pupils between the ages of 7 to 18. Along with data on body composition and serum total lipids profiles the scientists intended to find correlation between obesity and adverse health effects at younger age. The results are interesting in that no correlation was found between lipid profile and body composition in the adolescent group (12-18 years). On the other hand, in the younger children , ...

For young age [7-11 years], triglycerides and HDL-C are correlated to most of the body composition and anthropometric parameters in boys and not in girls.

The scientists speculate on whether the different fat distribution pattern in young boys (centrally dominant) could be one of the underlying reasons for this observation. Be that as it may, I consider this another good reason to encourage boys (and girls, alike) to act out their natural desire to move and exercise before they  become PlayStation cambling couch potatoes.