Caffeine Keeps You Going When You'd Usually Rack the Weight - Does That Cause an Increase in Muscle Damage?

With only 65mg of caffeine, an espresso provides only ~12.5% of the amount of caffeine used in the study at hand.

If you've kept an eye on the latest caffeine research you may have noticed that there's an increasing number of studies that fails to find significant performance enhancing effects of caffeine during resistance training sessions (Trevino. 2015). Does this mean that caffeine, a substance that is by the way on the World Anti-Doping Agency's list of prohibited substances useless for gymrats? Certainly not.

One thing most of these studies have in common is that they tested the subjects' strength or power production during short workouts. Studies that investigate the effects of caffeine in higher volume contexts, on the other hand (e.g. Lang. 2015; Thomas. 2015), confirm that caffeine is rightly the most (ab-)used ergogenic among fitness enthusiasts.

You can learn more about coffee and caffeine at the SuppVersity

For Caffeine, Timing Matters! 45 Min or More?

Coffee - The Good, Bad & Interesting

Three Cups of Coffee Keep Insulin At Bay

Caffeine's Effect on Testosterone, Estrogen & SHBG

The Coffee³ Ad- vantage: Fat loss, Appetite & Mood

Caffeine Resis- tance - Does It Even Exist?

One thing that has recently caught my attention on Facebook is the claim that the performance enhancing effects of caffeine put you at risk of rhabdomiolysis, i.e. the potentially dangerous breakdown of muscle tissue. In theory, it'd appear logical to assume that an agent that has repeatedly been proven to significantly lower the perceived exertion/fatigue as well as muscle pain during exercise could lead to a greater degree of muscle damage during exercise.

Figure 1: Graphical overview of the experimental design of Ribiero's study (Ribiero. 2016).

To test the hypothesis that acute caffeine ingestion could attenuate leg power, and increase blood lactate at the expense of increased muscle damage, researchers from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro recruited six male pro handball athletes who layed in the first division of the Brazilian National League of Handball (HBNL).

"All of them had at least 5 years of experience in the sport and trained for about 4 hours a day, 4-5 days a week. No athlete had a previous medical history of cardiopulmonary disease or used any medication during the study. The athletes reported intake of ~ 60 mg of caffeine per day (~ 1 cup of coffee)" (Ribiero. 2016).

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, the subjects reported to the laboratory at two occasions after an 8-h fast and at least 24h of caffeine abstinence. 60 minutes after having a standardized breakfast, which consisted of bread, white cheese, and orange juice (CHO: 87 g, 348 kcal; PTN: 13.5 g, 54 kcal; LIP: 7 g, 63 kcal; Total: 465 kcal), they consumed either placebo (PLA), or caffeine (CAF; 6mg/kg body weight) and remained seated for another 60 minutes.

But this is not resistance training! While you're absolutely right, jumping is at least as notorious for producing muscle damage as regular resistance training. It is thus unlikely that leg presses or squats would have produced a greater degree of muscle damage than this intense VJ protocol.

After the 60-minute delay during which the serum caffeine levels rose to peak values (see previous SuppVersity article), they performed a short warm-up and a standardized vertical jump test the scientists describe as follows:

Figure 2: Mean leg power during VJ (Ribiero. 2016).

"The VJ performance was evaluated by the jump platform System Optical (Cefise®, São Paulo, Brazil). This equipment consists of a laptop with the software "Jump System" (version 1.0, São Paulo, Brazil), connected by a cable to a resistive (or capacitive) platform (equipped with infrared optical sensors). The timer software is triggered by the feet of the subject at the moment of release from the platform, and will be stopped at the moment of touchdown. This equipment has the same principle of “Ergojump” to inform the flight time (ms) and contact (ms). 

The error of measurement, when compared with film analysis has been reported to be in the order of ± 2% (18). The athlete was positioned, barefoot, in the interior of the platform and the jumps were performed starting from a standing position until approximately at an angle of 90° knee, using help from upper limbs at the time of the VJ execution" (Ribiero. 2016).

The VJ data were analyzed by average leg power (Watts/Kg) generated by the athletes. In that, the scientists separated the total number of vertical jumps into tertiles, so that they could have an understanding of the behavior of the jumps in the 1st tertile (i.e., theoretically better performance), in the 2nd tertile (i.e., theoretically an average performance), and 3rd tertile (i.e., theoretically a drop in performance).

Your muscle is not the only thing that could be overtaxed - Even though the ability to perform more sets / work out more intensely / longer may not have affected the primary marker of muscle damage in the study at hand, the chronic consumption of high doses of caffeine may still pose a risk to your central nervous system and contribute to sympathetic overtraining. Therefore I'd still recommend you stick of max. 400-600 mg caffeine per day and, instead of increasing the dosage, when it stops working, take a "caffeine break" whenever you stop noticing the "caffeine spike".

This allowed Ribiero et al. to make comparisons between groups and to assess the effects of supplementation. Effects of which the data in Figure 3 tells you that they became evident only in the latter tertile of jumps:

Figure 3: Nonlinear regression analyses (polynomial regression 3rd order). Leg of the power generated in each sets of athletes with tertiles in placebo (PLA) and caffeine (CAF) trials (Ribiero. 2016).

As you can see in Figure 2, the subjects hit the wall in said third tertile in the placebo trial. In the supplement trial, on the other hand, the performance decline was significantly ameliorated - not only, but especially during the first and second set (black squares and white circles). This effect becomes even more obvious when you take a look at the leg power the subjects exerted on the jump platform during the jumps in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertile (plotted in Figure 2): compared to the use of placebo caffein improved the leg power the of athletes in the 3rd tertile (p <0.05) by 5.23%.

At the same time, however, it lead to a highly significant increase in blood lactate levels (+42.59%) after the execution of vertical jump test (p <0.05). In contrast to what the initially discussed hypothesis would suggest, though, this increase in lactate was not accompanied by significant increases in serum CK levels of the athletes (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: On average, the increase in CK was even lower in the caffeine trial - albeit not significantly (Ribiero. 2015).

So what does that mean? Well, the most obvious answer certainly is that using caffeine to boost your performance beyond "natural limits" is not going to increase your risk of rhabdomiolysis. On the other hand, the study doesn't say anything about the effects on the central nervous system and whether your CNS, not your muscle, could be overtaxed by "going beyond failure" with caffeine.

The potential negative effects of chronic caffeine consumption on the central nervous is a problem I've mentioned in the red box and discussed in previous articles about caffeine.

Unfortunately, this problem has not been sufficiently studied, yet. So, if you're looking for a supplement related topic for your master thesis, boys and girls, the effects of chronic pre-workout caffeine consumption at different dosages on the central nervous system could be just the topic you've been looking for ;-) | Comment on Facebook!

References:

• Lang, K., and E. B. LaFountaine. "Effects of caffeine as an ergogenic aid on weight lifting regimes in male collegiate athletes." International journal of exercise science: Conference proceedings. vol. 12. no. 1. 2015.
• Thomas, Gabrielle. Is coffee an effective pre-workout drink?–The effects of ingesting naturalistic doses of caffeine on one-repetition maximum muscular strength and muscular endurance in females. Diss. Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2015.
• Ribiero, et al. "Caffeine attenuates decreases in leg power without increased muscle damage." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (2016): Publish Ahead of Print | DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001332
• Trevino, Michael A., et al. "Acute Effects of Caffeine on Strength and Muscle Activation of the Elbow Flexors." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 29.2 (2015): 513-520.

Revisiting Caffeine + Lactate - In Combination They May be Powerful Muscle Builders Which Boost Satellite Cell Activity + Anabolic Signalling And Trigger Muscle Hypertrophy

High intensity training builds muscle and maximizes lactate build up. Caffeine helps you to train at maximal intensities. Correct, but there appears to be a more direct link between lactate accumulation, caffeine supplementation and skeletal muscle hypertrophy.

No, you are not mistaken: The headline says and means that caffeine and lactate are powerful agents that may promote skeletal muscle hypertrophy by boosting satellite cell activity and anabolic signalling in favor of muscle hypertrophy.

After a thorough review of the existing literature discussing the individual effects of caffeine and lactate on skeletal muscle metabolism and anabolism, Yoshimi Oishi and colleagues from the Ritsumeikan University hypothesized that "a lactate-based supplement containing caffeine, an activator of intracellular calcium signals, could elicit proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells, activate anabolic signals in skeletal muscle, and thereby increase muscle mass when combined with low-intensity exercise training."

Are you looking for other muscle building tips?

Tri- or Multi-Set Training for Body Recomp.?

Alternating Squat & Blood Pressure - Productive?

Pre-Exhaustion Exhausts Your Growth Potential

Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts!

Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong

Study Indicates Cut the Volume Make the Gains!

Well, you already know that they were able to proof their hypothesis, right? Let's still take a look at how they did that - at least briefly:

"To assess this hypothesis, we initially examined whether lactate and/or lactate-caffeine treatment could elicit proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells or activate anabolic signals in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Furthermore, we examined whether the administration of a mixed lactate and caffeine compound (LC compound), concomitant with endurance exercise training, could effectively increase muscle mass via activated satellite cells and/or anabolic signals in rat skeletal muscle" (Oishi. 2015)

I know, the human study is missing, but if you think about the intensity dependent increase in lactate production it appears logical to assume that increasing lactate levels which as previously been shown to...

• upregulate the expression of MCT1 and genes coding for other components of the mitochondrial reticulum in skeletal muscle (Brooks. 2009)
• increase myogenin (the satellite cell activator) mRNA in skeletal muscle cells in the petri dish (Hashimoto. 2007)

Now, this raises the question how calcium comes into play. According to Oishi et al. its beneficial effects are related the ability of caffeine supplements to increase the amount of intracellular calcium (Lu. 2007), which activates calcineurin, which will in turn induce slow and fast fiber hypertrophy (Talmadge. 2008) - unfortunately, this effect appears to favor type I (=endurance fiber) over type II hypetrophy, but this may well depend on the trigger that's used, i.e. endurance training as it was the case in a rodent study by Talmadge et al. or your strength workouts.

Figure 1: Graphical illustration of the mechanism by which caffeine and lactate may increase your gains.

Too complicated? Well, check out my graphical summary in Figure 1. I guess this should explain the basic mechanism: Lactate up = increase satellite cell proliferation = hotbed for muscle hypertrophy + calcium up = increased calcineurin = trigger for increased hypertrophy.

Bicarbonate supplementation buffers the decline in muscle pH and allows for 15% greater increases in lactate levels while still increasing training performance on a high volume, high intensity leg workout | read more

High intensity = high lactate, high intensity + bicarbonate = even higher lactate: The study at hand used lactate + caffeine supplementation and low intensity exercise. With high intensity exercise the increase the usefulness of additional lactate supplements may be significantly reduced, because higher intensity equals higher lactate accumulation anyway. As a previously discussed study on high intensity high volume leg training indicates, this effect can be augmented by sodium bicarbonate supplementation which allows for increased lactate levels in the absence of the debilitating effects of skeletal muscle acidosis (read more).

In the study at hand, the researchers quantified the effects on skeletal muscle hypertrophy by weighing the gastrocnemius and tibialis muscle of the rodents after 4 weeks of treadmill training and the effects on muscle restructuring via incorporation of new muscle nuclei (learn more) by measuring the increase in DNA content from exercise training alone and exercise training in conjunction with lactate + caffeine supplementation.

Figure 2: Exercise and exercise + supplementation induced changes in muscle weight and DNA content of skeletal muscle in mice exposed to four weeks of low intensity treadmill running (Oishi. 2015).

As the data in Figure 2 indicates, both muscle hypertrophy and the exercise induced increase in satellite cell activity were further augmented by the addition of lactate and caffeine in dosages of 1g/kg sodium-lactate and 36mg/kg caffeine.

In conjunction with the likewise observed increases in myogenin and follistatin expression of the fast twitch (that's what you use for lifting weights) gastrocnemius muscle relative to the exercise alone, the results of the study at hand clearly warrant the scientists conclusion that the administration of sodium lactate and caffeine "can effectively increase muscle mass concomitant with elevated numbers of myonuclei, even with low-intensity exercise training, via activated satellite cells and anabolicsignals" (Oishi. 2015).

So, what does this mean in practice? Assuming the same effects would occur in human beings the effective dosages of sodium lactate and caffeine would be 81mg/kg and 2.9mg/kg, respectively. Practically speaking you would have to take ~6.5g of sodium lactate and 232mg of caffeine.

Remember? Study suggests, significant increases in mitochondrial builder PGC1-a with HIIT + sodium bicarbonate | read more

That's quite a reasonable amount and should not have nasty side effects. Whether the sodium lactate offers additional benefits to trainees who work out far beyond the lactate threshold (remember: the rodents did only "light exercise"), remains questionable. The same goes for the question whether the addition of sodium bicarbonate would elicit similar beneficial effects on the lactate induced increase in satellite activity. In view of the fact that previous studies show that it does potentiate the beneficial effects on another albeit not directly related marker of mitochondrial changes in muscle structure, namely PGC-alpha (see previous SuppVersity article), I personally believe this would be worth investigating | Comment on Facebook!

References:

• Brooks, George A. "Cell–cell and intracellular lactate shuttles." The Journal of physiology 587.23 (2009): 5591-5600.
• Hashimoto, Takeshi, et al. "Lactate sensitive transcription factor network in L6 cells: activation of MCT1 and mitochondrial biogenesis." The FASEB Journal 21.10 (2007): 2602-2612.
• Lu, Ying-Mei, et al. "Imbalance between CaM kinase II and calcineurin activities impairs caffeine-induced calcium release in hypertrophic cardiomyocytes." Biochemical pharmacology 74.12 (2007): 1727-1737. 
• Oishi, Yoshimi, et al. "Mixed lactate and caffeine compound increases satellite cell activity and anabolic signals for muscle hypertrophy." Journal of Applied Physiology (2015): jap-00054.
• Talmadge, Robert J., et al. "Calcineurin activation influences muscle phenotype in a muscle-specific fashion." BMC cell biology 5.1 (2004): 28.

The Acute & 24h Effects of 3 Types of High Intensity Circuit Training on Testosterone & Cortisol in Young Trained Men.

It's obviously to have the 24h effects on testosterone and cortisol than only those measured after the workout , but can we make solid conclusions based on the additional data?

In spite of the fact that the acute testosterone and cortisol response to exercise appears to have little direct effects on the overall training outcome (Schoenfeld. 2013), acute increase in cortisol and reductions in testosterone, i.e. a decrease in the testosterone:cortisol ratio is a classic feature of overtraining and can very well blunt, if not reverse the beneficial effects of exercise on your health and body composition.

Against that background a recent experiment that was conducted by researchers from the University of Chieti-Pescara in Italy could be of great interest to everyone who is performing high intensity interval training on a regular basis. Why?

Well, in contrast to previous studies, Blasio et al. investigated both the acute and 24h effects of a high intensity interval resistance training regimen in trained young men.

Learn more about building muscle and strength at www.suppversity.com

Tri- or Multi-Set Training for Body Recomp.?

Alternating Squat & Blood Pressure - Productive?

Pre-Exhaustion Exhausts Your Growth Potential

Exercise not Intensity Variation for Max. Gains

Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong

Study Indicates Cut the Volume Make the Gains!

To characterize the effects on heart rate and hormonal responses the subjects, eight trained, healthy trained men (28.61 ±3.51 yrs), performed three different workouts which had the same exercises, the same load and number of repetitions for each exercise, but different exercise order, recovery and speed of execution.

• RANDOM workout: the assigned goal was to complete the assigned repetitions respecting only two duties. The first one was don’t stop until all of the repetitions were completed; the second was that there were no assigned order of execution of exercises and no assigned consecutive repetitions to complete.
  
  Participants were thus free to choose both the order of exercises and number of consecutive repetitions for each exercise (i.e. 2 repetitions of kettlebell swing, 10 repetitions of medicine ball slam, 20 repetitions of squat, 4 repetitions of spin with Bulgarian bag, etc.).
  
  No recovery period was assigned, except the time necessary to move from a station to another, and no speed of execution of exercises was assigned: participants were free to choose the preferred speed. 
• LADDER workout: respecting the following order of execution, kettlebell swing, medicine ball slam, spin with Bulgarian bag, squat, pull-up, burpee, participants had to complete the total repetitions according to a pyramidal scheme (e.g. 1st lap 10 repetitions at each exercise, 2nd lap 9 repetitions at each exercise) until the total number of repetitions of each exercise was executed.
  
  Each lap of the circuit was followed by 1 minute of recovery. No speed of execution of exercises was assigned: participants were free to choose the preferred speed. 
• AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (ASAP) workout : respecting the following order of execution, kettlebel swing, medicine ball slam, spin with Bulgarian bag, squat, pull-up, burpee, participants had to complete the total volume in six laps executed as soon as possible.
  
  During each lap participants had to complete the sixth part of total number of repetitions of each exercise without rest among exercises. Each lap of the circuit was followed by 1 minute of recovery.

Salivary samples were collected before and after each workout, at 11:00 p.m. and at 7:00 a.m. of the following day. Salive was also collected during a non-training day. Similarly, before and after the workout, plasma lactate was measured while a beat-to-beat heart rate recording was executed during each workout. Cortisol (C) and testosterone (T) were measured in salivary samples.

2h before the workouts the subjects who had to abstain from sexual intercourse, stimulants and alcohol from 2 days before to the experimental days and until 9:00 a.m. of the following day, consumed a standardized meal that was lower to 400 and consisted of 33 cl of water, 35 cl of orange juice and two 30 g energy bars (Power Sport Double Use, Enervit, Milan, Italy).

Let's look at the results

While the protocols elicited the same heart rate response (the major part of each workout was spent between 80 and 100% of maximal heart rate, confirming the high cardiovascular intensity of the workouts), they elicited different hormonal and lactate variations with the LADDER workout producing the lowest lactate increase and the RANDOM workout eliciting the highest lactate, cortisol and testosterone increases.

Figure 1: Relative changes in hormone and lactate concentration in response to the workouts (Di Blasio. 2014)

When C was considered in ratio with T no significant differences have been shown among workouts-induced variations. Results of the analysis of covariance, executed on significantly modified variables, confirmed that basal hormonal and lactate values did not influence their variations.

When they studied the effects of workouts on prolonged hormones production (i.e. until the morning following the morning, di Blasio et. al. found that observed that observed that

"C had both time (F=179.723; p < 0.001) and group × time effect (F=10.942; p < 0.001): while during non-training day there is a physiological decline of C production at 11:00 p.m., during training days its decline is not present but seems to have a continuous increase from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m." (Di Blasio. 2014)

For the testosterone production the authors found both time (F=443.340; p < 0.001) and group × time effect (F=3.254; p=0.008) even if the group × time effect seems determined by the samples collected at 7:00 p.m., so that the effects cannot be ascribed fully / exclusively to the workout.

Figure 2: 23h hormone profile after the RANDOM, LADDER, ASAP workouts on a control day (di Blasio. 2014)

What is most interesting, though, is the cortisol to testosterone ratio. It shows the greatest inter-group differences and could potentially be of great physiological relevance (Crowley. 1996). In that, the LADDER workout has the most negative effect, as it will totally blunt the natural decline of the C:T ratio at noon.

In case you're planning to incorporate circuit training into your schedule, make sure to have a huge chunk of beef after your workouts ;-) - "Post-Workout Steak "Supplementation" (135g of Lean Beef) Augments Improvements in Body Composition In Response to 8 Weeks of Circuit Resistance Training" | more

Bottom line: As usual, it is difficult to interpret the results in order to make concrete practical recommendations. The lactate and hormonal data does yet suggest that the "random" order, i.e. a training that involves a self-selected exercise order and rep speed, as well as little to no rest between exercises is the least, the ladder training, with its decreasing 10, 9, ... rep numbers and one minute rest between each lap of the curcuits is the most metabolically demanding workout.

Whether and to which extend this translates into an increased risk of overtraining, let alone increased muscle and strength gains, on the other hand, remains to be seen. In view of the overall effect on lactate levels and the C:T ratio, though, the study does suggest that you better be careful with high intensity circuit / interval resistance training sessions and give your body adequate time to rest and recover | Comment on Facebook!

References:

• Crowley, Michael A., and Kathleen S. Matt. "Hormonal regulation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats: the testosterone to cortisol ratio." European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology 73.1-2 (1996): 66-72. 
• Schoenfeld, Brad J. "Postexercise hypertrophic adaptations: a reexamination of the hormone hypothesis and its applicability to resistance training program design." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 27.6 (2013): 1720-1730.

Pyruvate Supplements - Useless as Ergogenic, Surprisingly Effective as Dieting Aid & Body Recompositioning Agent

Pyruvate = Recomp agent, not performance enhancer?

I am not sure if you even remember that pyruvate, which is made from glucose through glycolysis, and can be converted back to carbohydrates (such as glucose) via gluconeogenesis, or to fatty acids through acetyl-CoA, has once been touted as (yet another) "next big thing" by parts of the supplement industry.

The idea was that pyruvic acid could supply energy to working muscles through the citric acid cycle (also known as the Krebs cycle) when oxygen is present (aerobic respiration), and alternatively ferment to produce lactate when oxygen is lacking (fermentation) - this would make it the perfect workout fuel for high intensity exercise, but theory and practice are two very different animals.

The best way to shape your body? Build muscle, Ladies & Gents!

Tri- or Multi-Set Training for Body Recomp.?

Alternating Squat & Blood Pressure - Productive?

Hula Hoop Yourself to a Slim Waist!

Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts!

Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong

Study Indicates Cut the Volume Make the Gains!

Past studies investigating its efficacy have however yielded mixed results. In the year 2000, Michael A. Morrison , Lawrence L. Spriet , David J. Dyck reported that "oral pyruvate supplementation does not increase blood pyruvate content and does not enhance performance during intense exercise in well-trained cyclists." (Dyck. 2000)

Similarly disappointing results have been reported by Ebersole et al., likewise in the year 2000 for improvements in critical power (there were none) and stand in contrast to observations by JL Ivy who found that pyruvate, when "provided as an oral supplement for several days", whill "enhance aerobic endurance capacity" in rodents (Ivy. 1998) or Stanko et al. who found back in 1990 that feeding  dihydroxyacetone and pyruvate for 7 days  increased  arm  muscle  glucose  extraction  before  and  during exercise,  thereby  enhancing  submaximal  arm  endurance  capacity of (albeit) untrained men.

Weight & amp;fat loss(kg)/4.25-MJ deficit (Stanko. 1995) ➽ Pyuruvate makes dieting more effective.

Previous studies show that Pyruvate propels weight and fat loss: On a standardized 1.015kcal per day diet, subjects lost significantly more weight and body fat, when they received 30 grams of mixed sodium + calcium pyruvate per day. Plus: The pyruvate supplement had protein sparing effects, as well. In spite of the fact that the difference was not statistically significant, the subjects in the pyruvate group lost 5% less lean mass (relative to the total weight loss) than their peers in the placebo group.

Olek, et al. the authors of the most recent pyruvate paper in the open access journal nutrients, were well aware of the fact that pyruvate (PYR), in spite of its importance in energy metabolism, has not been shown to have ergogenic effects after prolonged supplementation. In view of the fact that Morrison et al. indicated that acute oral intake of calcium PYR (Calcium Pyruvate), even at a dose of 25 g, did not modify the PYR concentration in the whole blood or in the plasma, while Olek et al. have previously shown that a single dose of sodium PYR (NaP) does, the researchers from the Gdansk University ofPhysical Education and Sport in Poland decided to re-examine the effect of a single NaP ingestion on blood acid-base status and the exercise metabolism markers.

"Since 0.1 g of sodium bicarbonate per kg of body mass induces metabolic alkalosis 60 min following ingestion [14,15], we hypothesized that a similar NaP treatment before commencing the high intensity physical exertion may change the exercise metabolism." (Olek. 2014)

Nine active, but non-specifically trained, malesubjects (mean ± SEM: 23 ± 1 year old, 1.75 ± 0.02 m height, 72 ± 2 kg body mass) participated in the double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

"On separate days, the subjects reported to the laboratory in the morning, then rested for 30 min and then ingested placebo or NaP in a random order. In the previous studies the subjects consumed PYR in the amount of ~0.07–0.08 g/kg body mass;  therefore, the subjects in our study ingested NaP in a single dose of 0.1 g/kg body mass (which is ~0.08 g of PYR per kg body mass). " (Olek. 2014)

An hour following the ingestion, the subjects performed the physical exertion. The exercise protocol consisted of 2 min at a power output of 50 W and then for 6 min at a constant power output, corresponding to ~90% O2max. To determine  O2max, participants performed a graded cycle ergometry test on an electromagnetically-braked, cycle ergometer. After an initial warm-up period, the work rate was increased by 25 W/min until volitional exhaustion was achieved.

Figure 1: Lactic acid and blood pH during the placebo (•) and (o) pyruvate trial (Olek. 2014)

As you can see in Figure 1 the lactic acid concentration after the workout was significantly higher in the dotted pyruvate trial. Interestingly, though, the pH and thus the acidity of the blood was only marginally elevated - a clears sign that the buffering function of sodium pyruave Olek et al. had speculated about is real.

Pyruvate as a PGC-alpha driven metabolic engine builder: In view of the fact that high pyruvate levels would usually occur during intense exercise it's no wonder that researchers from Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research in Cambridge have found that it increases mitochondrial biogenesis in rodent muscle (Wilson. 2007)

Table 1: Gas exchange, ventilation and heart rate responses during and after severe-intensity exercise following placebo and sodium pyruvat eingestion. Values are the means ± SEM (Olek. 2014) | As you can see, there are no asterisks (*) which means: None of the differences reached statistical significance.

A brief glimpse at the measured differences in O2 uptake, CO2 output, minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate (see Table 1) does yet reveal that the study at hand generally confirms what previous studies by Ebersole et al (2000) and Morrison et al. (2000)  suggested: In spite of the fact that it would be 100% logical, if we saw performance improvements with pyruvate supplementation, the parameters Olek et al. recorded do not suggest that there were any.

And even when it was administered as creatine pyruvate, Van Schuylenbergh et al. did not find any benefits on cycling performance in a 2003 study.

Bottom line: In spite of the fact that it's physiological function would suggest that supplemental pyruvate should increase exercise performance, there is as of now no good evidence that it will actually do that.

Figure 2: Pyruvate may not improve performance, but it promotes improvements in body composition in dieting overweight men and women (Kalman. 1998).

Against that background you may be interested to hear that several studies suggest that it may not improve performance, but could help you lose weight. The ingestion of pyruvate 6 g/d for 6 weeks, along with regular exercise, for example, has been shown to reduce body fat, increase lean body mass, and improve fatigue and vigor scores in a 6-week, double-masked, placebo-controlled study that was conducted by Douglas Kalman et al. in 1998 to determine the effects of pyruvate supplementation on body weight, body composition, and vigor and fatigue levels in overweight men and women. Quite an impressive result. Specifically if you take into consideration that there were no changes in body composition in the placebo group who followed the same diet and training regimen.

Similar, albeit slightly less pronounced effects have been observed in the absence of dietary restrictions by Koh-Banerjee et al. (2005) and in a low energy + no exercise context by Stanko et al. (1992). Unfortunately, the mechanism(s) remain unclear. As Kalman et al. point out, previous rodent studies would suggest that an increase in insulin sensitivity and glycogen storage and decrease in fatty acid synthesis in fat cells may be at the heart of the effects the researchers observed 15 years ago | Comment on Facebook.

References:

• Ebersole, Kyle T., et al. "The Effect Of Pyruvate Supplementation On Critical Power." The Journal Of Strength & Conditioning Research 14.2 (2000): 132-134.
• Ivy, John L. "Effect of pyruvate and dihydroxyacetone on metabolism and aerobic endurance capacity." Medicine and science in sports and exercise 30.6 (1998): 837-843.
• Kalman, Douglas, et al. "Effect of pyruvate supplementation on body composition and mood." Current Therapeutic Research 59.11 (1998): 793-802.
• Koh-Banerjee, Pauline K., et al. "Effects of calcium pyruvate supplementation during training on body composition, exercise capacity, and metabolic responses to exercise." Nutrition 21.3 (2005): 312-319.
• Morrison, Michael A., Lawrence L. Spriet, and David J. Dyck. "Pyruvate ingestion for 7 days does not improve aerobic performance in well-trained individuals." Journal of Applied Physiology 89.2 (2000): 549-556.
• Stanko, Ronald T., Denise L. Tietze, and Judith E. Arch. "Body composition, energy utilization, and nitrogen metabolism with a 4.25-MJ/d low-energy diet supplemented with pyruvate." The American journal of clinical nutrition 56.4 (1992): 630-635.
• Van Schuylenbergh, Reinout, Marc Van Leemputte, and Peter Hespel. "Effects of oral creatine-pyruvate supplementation in cycling performance." International journal of sports medicine 24.02 (2003): 144-150. 
• Wilson, Leanne, et al. "Pyruvate induces mitochondrial biogenesis by a PGC-1 α-independent mechanism." American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 292.5 (2007): C1599-C1605.

Beta Alanine + Bicarbonate = Synergistic Internal + External Muscle H+ Buffer With Disappointing Real-World Benefits

No matter what this study says, I am pretty sure that the combination of bicarbonate + beta alanine would rule for Tour de France cyclists - at least during the dreaded time-trials.

In a recent study researchers from the Victoria University and the Queensland University of Technology observed that the combination of the carnonsine pre-cursor beta alanine and sodium bicarbonate will elevate the buffering potential of skeletal muscle in eight apparently healthy, recreationally active men (26.2 ± 1.9 year; 79.8 ± 2.11 kg; 179.0 ± 2.2 cm; VO2peak 51.0 ± 2.5 ml/kg/min) by increasing muscle carnosine and blood bicarbonate levels, respectively.

So much for the good news, the bad news however is that the performance increases on a repeated sprint test were non-signficant and the expected additive effects of beta alanine and baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) during a 110% cycling capacity test were non-existing.

You can learn more about beta alanine & bicarbonate at the SuppVersity

The Hazards of Acidosis

Build Bigger Legs W/ Bicarbonate

HIIT it Hard W/ NaCHO3

BA + Bicarb are Synergists

Bicarb Buffers Creatine

Beta Alanine Fails to HIIT Back

The trial participants were asked to complete 2 exercise tests, over consecutive days, at the end of each of the four co-supplement periods (see fig.  1).

Figure 1: Design of the study. Each trial consisted of two exercise tests performed over consecutive days. A total of 12 weeks between trials 2 and 3 was implemented to ensure adequate supplement washout time participants randomised to ingest β-alanine during the initial chronic supplementation. MRS Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, RSA repeated sprint ability test, CCT 110 %cycling capacity test. Solid  arrows depict crossover between acute supplementation (Pl and SB). Dotted arrows depict crossover between chronic supplementation (BAl and Pl; Danaher. 2014)

During the double-blind supplementation periods, the subjects consumed capsulated β-alanine (4.8g/day for four weeks, 6.4g/day for two weeks) or the placebo calcium carbonate (CaCO3). To investigate the superimposition of NaHCO3 (baking soda) with β-alanine, the acute administration of NaHCO3 occurred following each of  the 6-week periods of β-alanine and placebo supplementation.

Figure 2: The non-existing increases in peak and average performance with beta alanine and - with the exception of one outlier - bicarbonate supplementation is disappointing; value expressed relative to placebo trial.

This required two trials of either 300 mg/kg body weight sodium bicarbonate or a not wisely chosen "placebo", i.e. CaCO3 (While I have seen this repeatedly, I am asking myself how smart it really si to use calciumcarbonate as a placebo for a bicarbonate, if the carbonate will form HCO3 as soon as it is cleaved from the calcium ion?) , that was administered only once 90 min prior to the exercise bouts of the respective trials and was split into 6 equal doses over the first 50 min of the 90-min pre-exercise period.

Figure 3: Time to exhaustion, blood pH values during repeated sprint & cycling capacity @110% test (Danaher. 2014)

Bottom line: This is not the study to support the usefulness of bicarbonate and beta alanine supplementation for power athletes. It may be a study to support the usefulness of bicarbonate supplementation for Tour de France Trials, but it's also another study to show that the ergogenic effects of "buffers" outside of long(er) duration high intensity work like Tour de France time trials may be generally overrated.

With the study being underpowered, not 100% controlled in terms of the nutritional circumstances of the individual trials and questionable with respect to the use of calcium carbonate as a placebo supplement for sodium bicarbonate and beta alanine, I would be hesitant to discard the use of bicarb and beta alanine and a possible synergy. on the basis of the study at hand, though. Previous studies yielded different results.

Reference:

• Danaher, Jessica et al. "The effect of β-alanine and NaHCO3co-ingestion on buffering capacity and exercise performance with high-intensity exercise in healthy males." Eur J Appl Physiol (2014) 114:1715–1724